A: It's a loophole created under Section 14(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) that allows a state to enact a law prohibiting union security clauses in union contracts. It was enacted as part of the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act, a major anti-worker overhaul of Federal labor law pushed through by the 80th Congress despite a veto by President Harry Truman. It is worth noting that this was the first Republican controlled Congress since 1932.

 

 

 

A: A union security clause requires all workers who receive the benefits of a collective bargaining agreement (also called a union contract) to share the costs of the administration of that agreement. A Right to Work law prohibits a union security clause thus creating a "Right to Freeload" law.

 

 

 

A: No. Under Federal law no one can be forced to join a union before getting a job. That's called a "closed shop" and has been illegal under the National Labor Relations Act for years.

 

 

 

A: No. "Compulsory" unionism is a boogeyman created by folks with an anti-worker agenda. Again, under Federal law workers can never be forced to join a union even when there is a union security clause in the contract. This has been part of the law for years.

 

 

A: No. Once again, under Federal law workers can never be forced to pay dues for union political activities.

 

 

A: Yes. The real data shows that once "Right to Work" laws are enacted, they lower wages and benefits for all workers. Workers in "Right to Work" states earn far less then their counterparts in Non-Right to Work states. It's the same effect with benefits. For more information take a look a these reports:

 

 

A: No. Companies locate in a state for many reasons. If a company does consider locating in a state because of a "Right to Work" law, it's because of lower wages and benefits. Purposely enacting laws to lower wages and benefits for all workers in order to lure low-paying jobs to the state is not a sound economic plan for any state. California should have a sound economic plan that includes providing high wage jobs with good benefits for working families.

 

 

 

A: No. In fact, it has the opposite effect. It will create a climate in which businesses will increase profits because of lower wages but that's not good for the state or its workers. When wages fall, state revenues from income tax and sales tax fall as well. That means the state has far less funding available to finance education, transportation, and other programs that are vital to attracting new industries and businesses.

 

 

 

A: The National Institute for Labor Relations Research (NILRR) is an arm of the National Right to Work Committee and they have an anti-union political agenda. Further, many people have raised serious questions and doubts about their research methodology. There are many reports available from reliable sources that completely contradict the NILRR. If you see other reports from Right to Work supporters, look to see if they're quoting data from the NILRR.

 

 

 

A: It is an anti-union, special interest, out-of-state organization based in Virginia. It is one of the largest special interest groups behind these so called "Right to Work" laws. It has an anti-union agenda and raises a lot of money to wage war against unions all over the country which, in turn, lowers wages for all workers.

There are actually three branches of the National Right to Work Committee even though they don't appear to be the same organization. Additionally, they set-up or advise state "Right to Work" committees. The three NRTWC branches are:

2003 gross receipts for the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (NRTWLDF) were over 11 million dollars. It is very well funded. Since technically it is a 501(c)(3) "public charity" organization, its IRS Form 990 is available to the public. Take a look:

You'll also notice that although the NRTWC criticizes unions for opposing freeloaders, it has Visa and MasterCard links right on its home page soliciting for money. The Foundation has a link soliciting for money on its home page as well.

 

 

 

A: No. Right to Work laws have nothing to do with creating or providing jobs for workers?

 

 

 

A: No. A "Right to Work" state is an "at-will" employment state which means that you can be fired for any reason or no reason.

 

 

 

A: Correct. A Right to Work law does not guarantee any right to "work" nor does it stop an employer from firing you under the at-will doctrine.